Roussel – Symphony No.4 in A major, Op. 53 (1934) 

Albert Roussel’s Symphony No.4 in A major, Op. 53, composed in 1934, is a striking and inventive work that further exemplifies the French composer’s mature style and his command of symphonic form. The Symphony No.4 is considered one of Roussel’s most accomplished compositions, showcasing his imaginative orchestration and rhythmic vitality. 

The symphony comprises four movements: 

1. Lento – Allegro 

2. Lento – Andante 

3. Allegro molto 

4. Lento – Allegro 

Roussel’s Symphony No.4 opens with a Lento that gradually builds into a dynamic Allegro. The contrasting second movement features a lyrical Andante, displaying Roussel’s melodic sensitivity and his ability to evoke expressive depth. The third movement, Allegro molto, is marked by its energetic and propulsive character, featuring rhythmic complexities and vibrant orchestration. 

The final movement returns to a Lento section, creating a cyclical structure that reflects Roussel’s thematic integration and mastery of symphonic architecture. The movement concludes with an exhilarating Allegro, bringing the symphony to a powerful and triumphant conclusion. 

Throughout Symphony No.4, Roussel’s distinctive harmonic language and use of polyrhythms contribute to the work’s modern and forward-looking character. The symphony’s orchestration is meticulous, with Roussel exploiting the full colour palette of the orchestra to create a rich and varied sonic landscape. 

Comparing Symphony No.4 with Roussel’s earlier symphonies, such as the Symphony No.3 or the Symphony No.2, reveals the composer’s evolving style and his ongoing exploration of neoclassical elements. Symphony No.4 further solidifies Roussel’s reputation as a leading figure in early 20th-century French music. 

Albert Roussel’s Symphony No.4 remains a testament to the composer’s creative prowess, with its inventive use of form, rhythmic vitality, and expressive depth. The symphony stands as a notable contribution to the French symphonic repertoire, celebrated for its ingenuity and the synthesis of traditional and modern elements in Roussel’s compositional language.